Results 1 to 10 of 40

Thread: Montana LLC's

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    963

    Default

    Was in Prevost Ft Worth last week for a day and they were very busy. Week before the race at TMS and lots of pre-race traffic as well as snow birds passing through on their way home. The number of Montana plates was amazing. Meant to do a count while killing time but did not get around to it - guessing though that 2/3 of the motorhome and star coaches at the facility had Montana plates. This is going to amount to a large chunk of change for states to go after which means many of them will do it.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Port St. Lucie, FL
    Posts
    1,745

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GDeen View Post
    Was in Prevost Ft Worth last week for a day and they were very busy. Week before the race at TMS and lots of pre-race traffic as well as snow birds passing through on their way home. The number of Montana plates was amazing. Meant to do a count while killing time but did not get around to it - guessing though that 2/3 of the motorhome and star coaches at the facility had Montana plates. This is going to amount to a large chunk of change for states to go after which means many of them will do it.
    The "resident" state has nothing to lose by going after those with Montana plates on their coaches. All they need to do is come up with a name and address and send out the bill. The burden then falls on the resident to prove that they don't owe the past due sales and/or personal property tax.

    In any event, it will cost the resident in either legal and accounting fees or fines and taxes...... maybe even both.

    As Jon stated, those with a legitimate business purpose for having their coach owned by a Montana LLC are in the most defensible position.

    If it ever came to a trial, I doubt that the average tax-saddled jury member would side with the million-dollar bus owner who will be portrayed as a tax cheat by the prosecutor.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    285

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phorner View Post
    As Jon stated, those with a legitimate business purpose for having their coach owned by a Montana LLC are in the most defensible position.
    I might have mentioned this in another thread on this topic. If I did, forgive me. If I didn't, here I go.

    When you're checking your state's "Sales" tax laws, also check your state's "Use" tax laws. Usually they are together, and you've all probably heard the phrase "Sales and Use Tax." If you conclude that your Montana registration doesn't require you to pay "Sales" tax on your bus in your home state, then read the "Use" tax section and see if you conclude the same. I will not be surprised if you find out that you owe "Use" tax. I think in TN they are the same rate. It has been a while since I've done anything on this topic, so my guidance might not be sound.

    Eric Faires
    Huntsville, TN

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Location
    Spring
    Posts
    87

    Default

    Has anything changed in this regard in TX?

Similar Threads

  1. Montana LLC's
    By Just Plain Jeff in forum The 'Biz" of Prevost Ownership
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 04-24-2009, 12:45 PM
  2. Montana LLC ?
    By ajhaig in forum The 'Biz" of Prevost Ownership
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-23-2008, 11:23 AM
  3. Montana LLC - CO, IL & OH
    By truk4u in forum Law and Order
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 12-19-2007, 06:32 PM
  4. Montana ? ? ?
    By jello_jeep in forum TIPS ON TRAVEL
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 07-27-2007, 12:04 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •