Originally Posted by
Just Plain Jeff
Hang in there with me on this one.
It's my contention that the smell of the exhaust of a diesel engine is one way to determine how well the engine is running.
Here are some observations: Our 8V92 had the sweetest smelling exhaust; it seemed as if it ran like a Swiss watch. On startup, even if you had no other senses, you could identify the exhaust smell as an 8V92. The Series 60 also has a distinctive odor.
Now a few days ago, I was over at an RV dealership where there were a bunch of other coaches, mostly plastic. These were CAT and Cummins-powered coaches and the exhaust smell was distinctively different; indeed it smelled, 'raw,' suggesting that those engines were not as efficiently combusting the fuel. There was no apparent smoke coming from these mostly new coaches, but the particulate seemed to be less combusted, if that makes any sense.
So, for those of us who live for 'diesel smoke in the morning,' an 8V92 or a Series 60, as the nose goes, seem to do a much better job. What doesn't make sense in all of this however, is that my truck, which has a Cummins, smells more like the Detroits than the motorhomes. It does have the Hitman's custom 5-inch exhaust system on it, if that makes any sense.
All this makes me wonder about EGR standards and particulate emissions. If not all engines emit the same quantity of particulate/gallon, for example, creating standards for all diesel engines seems to be somewhat of an exercise in bureacracy (if particulate smell is an indicator). In statistics, that's called an Alpha error: Making an observation on a single case which applies to all members of a group.
What say y'all?