Results 1 to 10 of 86

Thread: Roof vs Cruise air

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Foley
    Posts
    94

    Default Roof vs Cruise air

    Some comments please on pros and cons of each type.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    anytown
    Posts
    8,908

    Default

    That's a topic that has been widely discussed. Do a search to find all the posts on the topic. Each has its pros and cons. Cruise Air is typically quieter and works very well to cool the house when parked. It is a more expensive AC with the condenser mounted in the basement and the evaporator remotely located upstairs. It's shortcoming is when used for cooling when over the road there are times when the heat radiating from the highway does not provide sufficient cooling air for the condenser and the unit shuts down. A lot of buses with Cruise Air also have OTR so it is rarely used for cooling when traveling.

    Roof airs may be noisier due to their location. The big advantage to roof airs is they will work well when the coach is in motion because the condensing unit is not picking up heated air radiating off a highway. The units are much less expensive than Cruise Air units and replacing them is easily done because they are readily available at almost any RV dealer. By having roof airs some bay space is freed up for other purposes. It is very rare to find a coach with roof airs equipped with OTR so they are the only source of AC whether in motion or not.

    Both types have about the same cooling expressed as 13,000 to 15,000 BTU. Both types will draw about 13 amps when running and the converter decides whether they are run solely via shore or generator power or if they can run through invererters while driving.

    The debates which have taken place in the past regarding OTR, Cruise Airs, and roof airs is all but over. As coaches are being outfitted with more than 2 slides OTR is impossible to provide because of the lack of a means for ducting. As more slides are being offered, bay space is being reduced as a result of the need for structural members and this makes the use of basement space for cruise air condenesers less available. Weight distribution also becomes an issue so I predict the days of Cruise Airs in coaches is drawing to an end.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Foley
    Posts
    94

    Default

    Thanks Jon, 2 questions, how much space is used in the bay or bays and does the condenser draw air from under the coach?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Indian Hills
    Posts
    1,136

    Default

    All three of our Cruise airs are behind the front bumper on out 40ft Beaver XL. But we also have OTR. Our previous 2 coaches had 4 Cruise airs, NO OTR, two condensors were behind the front bumper, and two were placed mid-body. The space the condensors take up is about the size of a 50 lbs bag of dog food.
    Jim and Chris
    2001 Featherlite Vogue XLV 2 slide with Rivets-current coach, 1999 shell
    Previous 22 years,
    We have owned every kind of Prevost shell but an H3-40

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Foley
    Posts
    94

    Default

    Jim did the cruise airs keep you cool when driving in hot conditions?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    thomasville,nc
    Posts
    1,209

    Default

    Dometic does not seem to want to be competitive with the price of cruise airs,just the compressor is over $500,and most roof airs are under $650,a new condenser from AAP is over $2500,but I love the cruise airs as they are very quiet and really cool great.I also think that not cutting holes in the roof is a real plus.I hope that Dometic gets more reasonable on their cruise air units.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •