Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Entertainer vs Motorhome

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    anytown
    Posts
    8,908

    Default

    There are two advantages to the MH XLII shell. The longer rear overhang provides a means of getting weight off the front axle by cantilevering the weight of the engine, transmission and whatever other weight the converter can place back there to offset weight that would go to the front axle. The second benefit is the turn radius is better than on the entertainer shell.

    With the use of the entertainer shell converters are going to have to work very hard to cut down on weight so the steer axle is not overloaded. I think that is why some converters are going to use the lithium ion batteries. Prevost saves a few bucks by eliminating one model from their lineup but it just transfers the cost to the MH buyer who ultimately pays for the methods used to save weight.

    But the turn radius difference is a non issue. As an owner gets accustomed to his turn radius and the pivot point it is doubtful he will wish he had the shorter wheelbase. In all my years of ownership there may have been one or two instances where I was able to make a turn with 0" to spare. Turns are usually relatively easy because there is ample room or they are so lacking it is obvious there is no way to make it. A foot or two difference in turn radius is not likely to make the difference. But what will change is drivers will have to be much more aware of high centering the coach, especially if the conversion has baffles or piping that hangs below the level of the bay doors. That disadvantage will be offset to an extent by a ride that should be slightly improved as a result of the longer wheelbase.

  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jon Wehrenberg View Post
    There are two advantages to the MH XLII shell. The longer rear overhang provides a means of getting weight off the front axle by cantilevering the weight of the engine, transmission and whatever other weight the converter can place back there to offset weight that would go to the front axle. The second benefit is the turn radius is better than on the entertainer shell.

    With the use of the entertainer shell converters are going to have to work very hard to cut down on weight so the steer axle is not overloaded. I think that is why some converters are going to use the lithium ion batteries. Prevost saves a few bucks by eliminating one model from their lineup but it just transfers the cost to the MH buyer who ultimately pays for the methods used to save weight.

    But the turn radius difference is a non issue. As an owner gets accustomed to his turn radius and the pivot point it is doubtful he will wish he had the shorter wheelbase. In all my years of ownership there may have been one or two instances where I was able to make a turn with 0" to spare. Turns are usually relatively easy because there is ample room or they are so lacking it is obvious there is no way to make it. A foot or two difference in turn radius is not likely to make the difference. But what will change is drivers will have to be much more aware of high centering the coach, especially if the conversion has baffles or piping that hangs below the level of the bay doors. That disadvantage will be offset to an extent by a ride that should be slightly improved as a result of the longer wheelbase.
    Doesn't item #1 apply to both MH and E?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    anytown
    Posts
    8,908

    Default

    A longer wheelbase (less rear overhang) increases the turn radius and by having a greater length between the axles instead of behind the rear axles the steer axle has to carry a greater load even if the house and bays are identical.

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jon Wehrenberg View Post
    A longer wheelbase (less rear overhang) increases the turn radius and by having a greater length between the axles instead of behind the rear axles the steer axle has to carry a greater load even if the house and bays are identical.
    Ok so it becomes a function of space vs. load. In other words the longer wheel base I assume is more desireable because of more storage/bays between axles vs. the desire to lighten the front axle load. Is this a correct assumption?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    anytown
    Posts
    8,908

    Default

    Yes. That longer wheelbase and the increased storage is one of the reasons the entertainer coach is like that. But keep in mind that the short space behind the wheels on the motorhome is not wasted. In my coach the space behind the tag axle houses the house batteries on one side and the Webasto and associated valving on the other.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •