Driving experience of XLII vs. XL?

[traveling.dude]

Does anyone have any thoughts on the driving experience (handling and steering) on an XLII ('01 - '03) vs. the older XLs ('98 - '00)? And 40' vs. 45'?

I'm currently considering the purchase of a '99 Royal for $250K vs. an '01 Royal for $325K. While I realize that the systems and the interiors are different, I'm trying to figure out if the newer XLIIs are worth the extra $$$s from a PERFORMANCE perspective.

Thanks,

Dude
Still looking for my first bus....

[dalej]

Wait!...let me get a cup of coffee and watch this one weigh itself out.

[Coloradobus]

traveling dude,
I will give you a few of our observations since we have owned XL,XLII, and an "H".. However,all were and are 45 footers.

XL vs XLII

XL has disc brakes steer & tag., XLII has disc brakes all axles
XL has single pane windows, XLII has dual pane, helps with noise, heat and cold ( no frost build up when below zero outside.
XL has manual telescope/tilt steering wheel, XLII air foot pedal activation
XL 45's needed a steering gearbox reenforcement update, XLII's didn't
XL riveted panel adher better than XLII, glued stainless.
XL front face can't be updated, XLII can
XL DDEC motors run cooler than the newer engines in XLII's
XL rear fenders are fixed in place, XLII fenders swing up which aids in tire changing, adding and running with chains on.
XL prior to around VIN T-5873 have a solid front axle, all XLII's are IFS

Older "H"3-45's, after mid 1998 have the same goodies as the XLII's. dual panes, tilt wheel operation, discs all the way around, cooler running motors, removable fenders.

We like our 2000 "H"3-45 the best out of the 3 we have had.
Softer riding, quieter, cooler running motor as opposed to our previous coach 2002 XLII Marathon.

Problem with all of them currently is Prevost has NO replacement window for the sides. We wonder when they will rectify this.

[Gary & Peggy Stevens]

Dale, you better make that a POT of coffee. A cup won't last long enough.


Dude, you are in an extremley good place right now. STILL LOOKING, that is probably the most fun you will ever have.

1) Have you driven both models?
2) What do you like / dislike about each one?
3) Which of the ones you are looking at have MORE of the features you like?
4) Have you read EVERY Post on the POG site. That would answer a lot of these questions for you, and confuse you even more.
5) But you are STILL LOOKING, so you are ahead of the game.

Just saw Jims post "Coloradobus". He did an excellent job of telling you the differences, NOW it is up to you.


Good Luck.

Gary S.

[Jon Wehrenberg]

I have only owned rivet coaches, a 40 and a 45. No contest. The extra 5 feet in the 45 is worth it so much we would never go back to a 40.

Solely on the basis of future repair costs I would not buy an XLII. There is clearly a problem with bonding of the sides and those bonding issues while currently being dealt with at Prevost expense will at some time shift to the owner.

There have been problems with windows and replacement is not only expensive, but supplies have been very limited. Again, Prevost has been good about dealing with this issue, but in the future the burden shifts to the owner.

The XLII is supposed to be significantly quieter. That was not the case on the two that I drove. I could not say there was any reduction in wind noise.

If you are worried about driving a coach that looks old, get the XLII. If you want a coach that represents the most trouble free and least expensive to repair and service get the XL.

[Steve Bennett]

I have driven quite a few of all types. I would say that typically a XLII is going to have less wind noise around the front windshield & door. They will also be quieter with regards to ambient exterior noise due to the dual pane windows, and fiberglass vs. aluminum upper skin. The 40' coaches will be a little lighter in weight, and are considerably more maneuverable do to the shorter wheelbase, and lesser rear overhang. The 40' coach will have slightly more engine & drive-train noise do to the closer proximity. The 40' coaches surprisingly also have slightly less pitching motion on the concrete freeways because of the shorter overhang. The 45' coach will have considerably more room in the stateroom/bath area than a 40'. The 45' coach can also accommodate a private water closet better than the 40'. In our area the 40' coaches are in greater demand do to the maneuverability, and the restricted roadways and length limit restrictions. In the SouthEast the 45's are more popular. The XLII did have a suspension upgrade around the 02 Chassis year that softened up the front end a bit. The 365 tire/wheel upgrade will also soften up the ride slightly by allowing lower front air pressures. John is correct in noting that the XLII is prone to more issues than the XL's. The XL coach is very straightforward in it's construction, and is less expensive to maintain. The Series 60 engine was also more fuel efficient in its' earlier versions than the newer engines are. Particularly prior to the EGR engine in the 04 chassis & newer.

[rfoster]

Additional info XL2 vs XL

XL2 has a bit wider entrance door opening maybe 2", than XL
XL2 has power door lock engine door, Jon has keys to everyones XL.
Xl2 is approx four inchs taller than XL -a big problem if you do not have at least 12'7" door way.

[Jerry Winchester]

Jon's dead wrong on this one. XLII is quieter hands down.

[Jon Wehrenberg]

Compared to a vintage Royale with an 8V92 screaming along at almost max RPM and a Series 60 loafing along at barely above idle speed.


The Dude is looking for a comparison of two coaches 2 years apart, not a piece of history and a modern one.

My original coach and the coach I have now are so far apart in noise level, quality of construction, ride, and engine characteristics that you cannot compare older vintage 8V92 coaches with the coach years being compared.

[Joe Cannarozzi]

So lets see some here are DRIVING pieces of history and others ARE pieces of history.

No matter I am a history buff